Review, prioritize, and remediate findings from a secrets scan.
After a secrets scan, Endor Labs raises a finding for each detected secret. You can review the findings, understand their severity, and take corrective action.
When a rule includes a validator, Endor Labs checks whether a detected secret is still active and shows the result as the Validation status on the finding.
Valid: The secret authenticated successfully and is active. Endor Labs raises these as critical findings.
Invalid: The secret did not authenticate and is likely revoked or expired.
Unverified: Endor Labs did not validate the secret, either because the rule has no validator or because validation could not complete.
Validation reduces noise, because you can focus on the credentials that currently provide access. See Validator for how validation is configured.
Endor Labs groups an identical secret found in multiple files, branches, or repositories into a single finding. Each finding lists every location where the secret appears, so you can assess the full exposure and remediate once. A higher occurrence count signals wider exposure and higher risk.
If a finding is a known false positive, suppress it rather than ignoring it. Endor Labs offers inline annotations, rule allowlists, and finding-level exceptions. See Exclude false positives from secret scans.
When pull request comments are enabled, Endor Labs posts secret findings as inline comments on the changed lines, so developers see them in context. Inline comments are supported on pull requests and merge requests in GitHub, GitLab, Azure DevOps, and Bitbucket.Enable comments with --enable-pr-comments in a CI scan, or with the pull request comment setting in your SCM integration or scan profile. See Pull request scans and CI/CD integrations.
Was this page helpful?
Assistant
Responses are generated using AI and may contain mistakes.